Anagram Clues

Our definition here is 'Grow', and our answer will be another word for that.

This clue's indicators are 'closer to' and 'shared between'. One of these is a fairly straightforward (albeit somewhat disguised) selection indicator, pointing out the position of a specific letter in neighbouring fodder. The other uses one piece of fodder to describe how two other pieces relate to each other. This is not a standard indicator at all - good luck!

This clue's fodder is 'Hannah', 'time', '8', and '10'. We'll need to find straightforward substitutes for three of these and use them with one or more letters from the other to construct our answer, as guided by the clue's indicator(s).

Our definition here is 'circular intersection?', and the question mark is priming us to think a little more laterally than we normally might. Our answer will be a kind of circular intersection.

This clue's indicator is 'crashed' and it's an anagram indicator. Some neighbouring letters have crashed, a destructive act that reshapes those letters into a new form. 'into' could be interpreted as part of this anagram indicator - letters are 'crashed into' - or just a linking word between the wordplay and the definition - the crashing will transform letters 'into' an answer matching our definition.

This clue's fodder is 'Midrange van'. We'll use these letters to form our answer, as guided by the clue's indicator(s).

Our definition here is 'bread in Mexico?' and, with the question mark flagging some slight stretch, our answer will be another word for bread in Mexico.

This clue's indicators are 'Fussy' and 'leaves'. One of these is an anagram indicator - some neighbouring letters will get visually busy by rearranging. The other is a deletion indicator - some fodder will leave other fodder and continue without it.

This clue's fodder is 'spouse' and 'United States'. We'll need to find a short substitute for one of these and use it with the letters of the other to construct our answer, as guided by the clue's indicator(s).

Our definition here is 'Corporate style guides might consider it unprofessional', and our answer will is something notoriously unprofessional from a stylistic standpoint.

This clue's indicator is 'Rocking' and it's an anagram indicator. We'll be shocking, shaking, stunning, wobbling, bewildering, startling and disturbing some neighbouring fodder (all ideas embodied in 'rocking'), and it will rearrange as a result.

This clue's fodder is 'moccasins'. We'll use these letters to construct our answer, as guided by the clue's indicator(s).

Our definition here is 'that’s basic', and our answer will be a word that means basic.

This clue's indicators are 'has straightened curls', 'centre', and 'parting for'. Let's talk about 'has straightened curls' - a new kind of indicator for us (a homoglyph), suggesting we'll be playing with shapes and the look of letters. We'll need to take the curly shape/s in some neighbouring fodder and straighten them into different letter/s. 'parting for' is a swapping indicator: something leaves fodder and its place is taken by something else. And 'centre' is an old familiar selection indicator pointing to the letter at the centre of some fodder.

This clue's fodder is 'Vanessa', and 'me'. We'll use the letters of 'Vanessa' (some of them transformed) and a short synonym for 'me' to reach our answer, as guided by the clue's indicators.